Why Cryptocurrency Is a Better Store of Value: Arthur Hayes' Perspective

·

Introduction

Some market participants have recently expressed doubts, suggesting that the cryptocurrency bull run has concluded or that Bitcoin's momentum has stalled compared to major U.S. tech stocks. However, these views often overlook the broader geopolitical and monetary shifts taking place globally.

We are witnessing a transition from a unipolar, U.S.-dominated world order to a multipolar system involving influential players like China, Brazil, and Russia. Governments are increasingly resorting to financial repression and money printing to fund deficits, while escalating geopolitical tensions contribute to inflationary pressures. In such an environment, traditional assets like stocks and bonds may struggle to preserve value, making a strong case for alternative stores of value like cryptocurrency.

Understanding Historical Cycles: Local vs. Global Eras

History tends to move in cycles, alternating between what can be termed "local" and "global" eras.

During local periods, governments implement financial repression to fund wars and maintain stability. Savings are suppressed, capital controls may appear, and inflation often rises. These are periods of inward-looking economic policies.

In global eras, financial restrictions ease, international trade expands, and deflationary forces tend to dominate. Capital flows more freely across borders, and cooperation between nations increases.

For investors, the key is to recognize which era we are in and adjust portfolios accordingly.

Investment Choices Across Cycles

Equities are legal constructs reliant on state enforcement. Thus, they tend to thrive in global, deflationary cycles but can underperform during local, inflationary periods.

Key Dates in Monetary History

The American Ascendancy (1933–1980)

Post-World War II, the U.S. emerged unscathed relative to other nations. Its industrial capacity helped rebuild Europe and Asia, generating substantial returns.

However, the cost of war necessitated financial repression. Gold ownership was banned, the Fed merged with the Treasury, and yield curve control kept government borrowing rates artificially low. With gold outlawed and interest rates capped, equities became one of the few avenues for savers to outpace inflation.

Even after President Nixon ended the gold standard in 1971, stocks continued outperforming gold—until capital was again free to bet against the system.

The Peak Global Cycle (1980–2008)

Confidence in America’s victory over the Soviet Union led to political shifts. Financial deregulation intensified, and the petrodollar system bolstered dollar demand.

Volcker’s high-interest-rate policy tamed inflation, strengthening the dollar and kickstarting a period of global trade expansion. Gold underperformed equities significantly during this era.

The Modern Localized Cycle (2008–Present)

The 2008 financial crisis marked another inflection point. Instead of banning gold, the Fed embraced QE—creating new money to buy government bonds.

Proxy wars resurged, and nations began prioritizing domestic economic resilience. Financial repression returned, with savers implicitly funding government deficits via low interest rates and inflationary policies.

This time, however, a new asset class emerged: Bitcoin.

Unlike gold, Bitcoin operates on a cryptographic ledger, enabling borderless, near-instantaneous transfers. Unlike fiat currency, its supply is algorithmically capped. These features have helped Bitcoin dramatically outperform both stocks and gold since 2009.

The End of Quantitative Easing and the New Credit Regime

QE encouraged misallocation of capital. Companies used cheap credit for share buybacks rather than productive investments, weakening industrial capacity.

Today, credit allocation is becoming more state-directed. Banks are urged—or forced—to lend to strategic sectors, similar to models in China, Japan, or South Korea. Returns on savings are likely to lag inflation.

In this environment, moving capital outside the traditional system may be the only way to preserve value. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies serve this role.

Instead of monitoring central bank balance sheets, investors should now watch fiscal deficits and non-financial bank lending. These indicate how much new credit is being created to fund government spending and corporate loans.

Why Bitcoin Will Regain Its Momentum

Current macroeconomic conditions support a bullish outlook for Bitcoin:

With fiscal and monetary conditions remaining loose, currency debasement seems inevitable. Bitcoin, as a decentralized, scarce asset, is well-positioned to outperform.

👉 Explore advanced investment strategies

Frequently Asked Questions

What is financial repression?
Financial repression refers to policies that channel savings to the government at below-market rates, often through interest rate caps, capital controls, or directed lending. It effectively transfers wealth from savers to borrowers, typically the state.

Why does Bitcoin outperform gold in modern cycles?
Bitcoin combines gold’s scarcity with the speed and portability of digital currency. Its cryptographic ledger allows secure, instant transfers across borders, making it more suitable for a digitalized global economy.

How can investors monitor credit growth today?
Focus on fiscal deficits and bank lending to non-financial corporations. These metrics better reflect credit expansion in the current era than central bank balance sheets alone.

Is the cryptocurrency bull market really over?
Macroeconomic trends—such as rising deficits, geopolitical tensions, and loose monetary policy—suggest that the current cycle favors hard assets like Bitcoin over traditional equities.

What role do governments play in credit allocation today?
Many governments are increasingly directing credit to strategic sectors, either through explicit mandates or subsidized loans. This reduces market efficiency and often lowers returns for private savers.

Can Bitcoin really serve as a safe haven during inflation?
Yes. Bitcoin’s fixed supply and decentralized nature make it resistant to inflationary monetary policies. Its performance since 2008 underscores its value as a hedge against currency debasement.